|
|
Post by sarawaterson on Feb 19, 2008 1:43:00 GMT
|
|
kayr
verified member
asbo alex now with an offical asbo!!!
Posts: 3,214
|
Post by kayr on Feb 19, 2008 9:10:09 GMT
the postcode should read S61 and if fay or andrea our dog wardens have him he will be safe
|
|
|
|
Post by scoop on Feb 19, 2008 14:40:47 GMT
Can anyone tell us, if the ear marks are known, what they are?
It should be easy to trace some of the dogs history from them.
I hope the dog makes a full recovery and finds a loving home to live out the rest of his days.
regards,
Maureen
|
|
|
|
Post by sarawaterson on Feb 25, 2008 20:34:37 GMT
Presumably anyone who is missing a dog of this description will ring in with the tattoo number
Wardens and rescues don't give them out - the owner has to provide them, to stop people falsely claiming the dog
I assume the warden in question checked the tattoo number and the owner could not be traced, which quite often happens with tattoos and chips - people forget to update the database when they move or change tel number
|
|
|
|
Post by scoop on Feb 25, 2008 21:19:39 GMT
Presumably anyone who is missing a dog of this description will ring in with the tattoo number Wardens and rescues don't give them out - the owner has to provide them, to stop people falsely claiming the dog I assume the warden in question checked the tattoo number and the owner could not be traced, which quite often happens with tattoos and chips - people forget to update the database when they move or change tel number I fully appreciate the problem of giving out earmarks but I would have thought that a call to the NGRC would be the best place to start trying to trace the owner rather than looking on databases. It may be that the last registered NGRC owner sold the dog and did not advise the NGRC but at least it could be a starting point. regards, Maureen |
|
